SHIFTING THE ENTIRE PARADIGM OF HEALTH AND REALITY: 17 Reasons Why It Matters If Viruses Exist, and learning where you stand in relation to assessing your health.

 

Why Does It Matter Whether Viruses Exist?

Here’s 17 reasons why it really matters.

D. ALEC ZECK

MAR 29

If you’ve followed me for a while, you’ve probably seen me talk about this quite a bit — and you might already understand why it matters.

But if you’re new here, or only catch some of my content, you might be wondering: what’s the big deal? Why does it matter so much whether viruses exist or not?

I assure you, it matters deeply. And if this idea is completely new to you, I recommend checking out some of my earlier posts or listening to episode 141 of my podcast before diving in:

https://rumble.com/v40gn7j-reframing-the-infectious-disease-paradigm-a-presentation-by-alec-zeck.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

1. Collapse of the Vaccine Program

If viruses don’t exist as claimed, the entire foundation of vaccination crumbles.

Billions are spent annually developing and distributing vaccines to “protect” against pathogens that have never been demonstrated to exist.

Without viral causation, these interventions become not only ineffective and unsafe, but totally useless and entirely unnecessary.

It would demand a total reevaluation of public health strategies.

2. Exposes the False Dilemma: Lab Leak or Natural Virus

The “gain of function vs. natural origin” debate assumes viruses exist in the first place. But both are based on unproven claims and circular reasoning.

Once you understand this, you realize the entire debate is a distraction from more important questions. Check out episode 40 of my podcast, where I interview Dr. David Martin — widely cited to support gain-of-function claims — who clearly states that there is not, and never has been, a transmissible particle created through such research.

3. Stops the Senseless Culling of Animals

Every year, millions of animals are culled to "stop the spread" of supposed viruses like avian flu.

For instance, since February 2022, more than 166 million birds have been euthanized due to supposed H5N1 outbreaks.

This not only causes immense suffering but also destabilizes ecosystems and food systems. When you understand that PCR primers are developed using genetic material that has never been shown to come from a virus, the entire justification for these cullings collapses under scrutiny. It’s not just unnecessary — it’s an ethical and ecological disaster.

4. We'd Start Looking at the True Causes of Illness

When you stop blaming invisible invaders, you start asking deeper questions like:

What roles do terrain, toxins, trauma, lifestyle, and emotional stress play in disease?

What if symptoms are the body’s intelligent response — not something to suppress, but something to support?

And how many chronic conditions are being misattributed to viruses when the real causes are right in front of us?

5. End the Medical Tyranny

From lockdowns to masks to coerced injections — policies justified by “viral threats” have enabled unprecedented control.

If the foundational premise is false, so is the justification for medical coercion.

Focusing on masks and vaccines is important — no doubt, but without confronting the fraud of virology itself, it’s like whacking at the branches of a tree that keeps growing back. To stop the tyranny at its root, we have to expose the pseudoscience of virology.

6. Overlooking Metaphysical Possibilities

What if illness isn’t just physical — what if it also reflects emotional, energetic, or spiritual imbalance? Could symptoms be messengers, not enemies?

Have we been so focused on microscopic particles that we’ve ignored the role of consciousness, intention, and coherence in health?

If we explored these questions seriously, how might it shift our entire understanding of what it means to heal?

7. We Realize the Power of Belief in Health

When the virus illusion dissolves, we start to see just how much our individual and collective beliefs shape our health — for better and for worse.

Fear, expectation, and suggestion can all manifest physically, while trust, coherence, and inner alignment can promote healing.

The placebo and nocebo effects, mass psychogenic illness, and social contagion aren't side notes — they’re central clues. This realization puts us back in the driver’s seat of our well-being.

8. We Begin Studying the Biofield more Seriously

If diseases aren’t caused by microbes, we need to explore the energetic systems that regulate the body.

Modern science admits we can only perceive about 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum — what might we be missing in that vast unknown? The biofield — long dismissed by mainstream science — may hold the key to understanding health and coherence.

Could there be subtle forms of communication and regulation happening on an energetic level that we're only beginning to grasp? If so, are we ignoring one of the most fundamental layers of human health and biology? I discuss the biofield on these three episodes of my podcast:

Episode 5, The Human Biofield with Eileen McKusick

Episode 88, Tuning the Zodiac & Balancing Through Sound featuring Eileen McKusick

Episode 121, Ez-Water, Aether, & The Biofield featuring Carrie Bennett

9. Reclaim Trust in the Body's Innate Intelligence

The mainstream view often frames the body as vulnerable, constantly under threat from external invaders.

But what if there’s another way to see it— not as flawed, but as intelligent and responsive?

Could symptoms, no matter how unpleasant, be adaptive processes — part of the body’s effort to restore balance?

Trusting that inner intelligence may be one of the most important shifts we can make.

10. We'd Stop Fearing Others Who are Sick

The belief in contagious viruses creates social division and isolation.

If “infection” is misunderstood, there’s no reason to fear friends, family, or strangers simply because they’re unwell.

This could restore human connection, compassion, and trust in our body’s ability to adapt.

We’d stop pathologizing what are likely natural detox processes.

11. It Sharpens Your Lens on Other Unproven Assumptions

Once you see the lack of evidence behind virology, you begin to recognize similar patterns in other areas of “science” and medicine.

You start asking: what else have I accepted without question? Is the same circular reasoning, groupthink, or institutional dogma hiding behind other “consensus science”?

It teaches you to ask better questions, understand logic and empiricism, and stop outsourcing your critical thinking.

12. It Exposes the Limits of Modern "Science"

Much of what we call “science” today isn’t science at all — failing to follow the scientific method and actually validate cause-and-effect claims.

Virology is a prime example: no proper controls, no isolation, no direct evidence — just assumptions and models treated as fact.

It’s absurd to believe that what happens in an artificial lab environment can reveal, with certainty, the inherent intelligence and complexity of nature. True science should observe nature, not try to dominate or simulate it.

13. It Reframes How We View History

If the virus model is entirely unproven, then how do we reinterpret events like the 1918 flu, polio, HIV/AIDS, or COVID?

What if those events were driven by toxic exposures, pharmaceuticals, war trauma, mass psychogenic illness, nnEMFs, or starvation — not invisible particles?

This reframing doesn’t just change our understanding of disease — it changes how we understand power, policy, and propaganda.

14. It Breaks the Spell of Medical Authority

The virus narrative has handed massive control to centralized medical systems and unelected global institutions. If that narrative is false, so is their claim to authority.

It also forces you to question “experts” more broadly — if they got this wrong, what else have they misled us about? And who are they to tell you how to handle your own health, your body, or your life?

15. It Calls Us Back to Harmony With Nature

When you remove the concept of viral invaders, you also remove the idea that nature is something to fear or control.

We stop waging war on the very environments and ecosystems we’re meant to live in harmony with. Health becomes about rhythm, resonance, and relationship — with light, water, food, movement, community, and the Earth itself. Symptoms are no longer threats, but intelligent signals inviting us back into alignment with our natural design.

This shift reconnects us with the wisdom of the body and the intelligence of life.

16. It Reveals the Power of Story to Shape Reality

The virus myth is a story — and a very effective one.

It shaped worldwide behavior, justified authoritarian policies, and rewrote public consciousness.

If this story can manipulate billions, what other narratives are shaping our worldview?

Understanding the power of narrative helps us reclaim our perception — and write a new one.

17. It Shifts the Entire Paradigm of Health and Reality

This isn’t just a scientific debate — it’s about how we see life itself.

Exposing the failed viral hypothesis breaks the spell of fear and opens space for deeper exploration on health and the nature of reality.

It’s allowed me to remember that health is our natural state, and that reconnection might be the most important medicine of all.

PRESIDENTS COME AND GO, BUT NOT ALL ARE DEPOSED BY THE BALLOT BOX. Some Brave Individuals Have Stood Up To Those Who Have Ulterior Motives And Even Exposed Their Evil Deeds. Sadly, they were taken out and a fake narrative was created for their demise.

President John Magufuli of Tanzania, an industrial chemist prior to entering politics, had fruit and animal tissue sent to the WHO labs in his country for PCR testing labelled with people's names to see how genuine were the tests.. The lab sent the tests back positive for COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 for the pawpaw and the goat.

Magufuli made a spectacle out of the fake tests by holding a press conference and refused to inject his people. After that he went missing for two weeks and was said to have died from COVID-19. 

Burundi President Pierre Knurunziza rejected the injections and he too suddenly died. 

Actually, I believe six African Presidents died suddenly after resisting the WHO's fake tests and rejecting the injections during 2020-21. 

African resistance stuffed up Gates plan to lower the population by 15%, as he said would happen if they implemented his (farcical) vaccine program well. 

In two Indian states Bill Gates polio vaccination program inflicted nearly a million children with 1) Acute Flaccid Paralysis and 2) Non Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis (NPAFP) which is exactly the same as polio, except the name is changed to create two diseases and giving he impression that they are not connected to polio. More particularly, Bill Gates doesn't want these associated with his junk vaccines. 

Table 2.
Excess NPAFP in each year from 2000–2017.
Year	AFP Rate	NPAFP Rate	AFP	NPAFP	Expected NPAFP	Excess NPAFP
2000	2.16	1.94		7260	7485	−225
2001	1.91	1.75	7510	6858	7838	−980
2002	2.45	1.87	9713	7404	7919	−515
Oct-03	2.11	1.67	6850	5417	6487	−1070
2004	3.24	3.11	13,274	12,765	8209	4556
2005	6.54	6.43	27,049	26,586	8269	18,317
2006	7.63	7.35	32,194	31,024	8442	22,582
2007	9.71	9.32	41,534	39,831	8547	31,284
2008	10.5	9.93	45,586	43,103	8681	34,422
2008	11.64	11.33	50,412	49,082	8664	40,418
2010	12.7	12.65	55,785	55,548	8782	46,766
2011	13.55	13.35	60,750	59,849	8966	50,883
2012	13.97	13.61	61,038	59,462	8738	50,724
2013	12.51	12.48	54,645	54,511	8736	45,775
2014	12.48	12.48	53,933	53,910	8639	45,271
2015	10.78	10.77	46,970	46,957	8720	38,237
2016	10.61	10.16	46,524	44,571	8774	35,797
2017	8.97	8.72	39,339	38,232	8769	29,463
Totals			653,106	642,370	150,666	491,704	1,295,476

  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/ 

Poliomyelitis hasn't been eradicated. It is caused by environmental toxins and the condition has been eliminated by providing different names to its many variations in addition to the two already mentioned [1) Acute Flaccid Paralysis and 2) Non Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis (NPAFP)] They are: 

3. Acute Flaccid Myelitis 

4. Transverse Myelitis 

5. Guillaine Barre 

6. Bell’s Palsy 

7. Meningitis  

8. Encephalitis 

9. Transverse Meningitis 

10. Muscular Dystrophy 

11. Multiple Sclerosis 

The more this is exposed the greater hope we have of seeing people becoming healthy without the need for what are poisonous pharmaceutical interventions. The historical charts of health, illness and vaccines tells the real story. You will find some of them at the this link: https://dissolvingillusions.com/graphs-images/

People claim that nobody could be this evil, and to suggest that workers would load toxins into the vaccines is preposterous. Not if you like them, believe you are doing good. Besides few know what goes into the vaccines. This is only discovered upon analysis. A costly procedure to do. So nobody bothers to take the time. 

The USFDA permits eleven elements in vaccines: aluminum, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, thallium and zinc, which are toxic in high dosages. In low dosages they are considered harmless and are referred to as adjuvants that facilitate the vaccination process. However, they accumulate within the body. And some manufacturers licensed by the pharmaceutical companies may have the occasional batch tested for compliance. Since every batch is not tested, consequently, some batches have higher dosages of these heavy metals.

In Bill Gates case, he sees himself eradicating vermin from the Earth; "useless eaters" is what he calls the common individual, who is retired or looking for work or has an indigenous lifestyle or is living in poverty. 

In the worker's case, they see themselves helping a good cause, believing they are participating in a beneficial humanitarian program. 

NOTES ON NURSING: WHAT IT IS, AND WHAT IT IS NOT

BY

FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE.

LONDON:
HARRISON, 59, PALL MALL,
BOOKSELLER TO THE QUEEN.

[The right of Translation is reserved.]

PRINTED BY HARRISON AND SONS,

ST. MARTIN'S LANE, W.C.

The following is from pages 18-20

I will tell you what was the cause of this hospital pyæmia being in that large private house. It was that the sewer air from an ill-placed sink was carefully conducted into all the rooms by sedulously opening all the doors; and closing all the passage windows. It was that the slops were emptied into the foot pans;—it was that the utensils were never properly rinsed;—it was that the chamber [Pg 18]crockery was rinsed with dirty water;—it was that the beds were never properly shaken, aired, picked to pieces, or changed. It was that the carpets and curtains were always musty;—it was that the furniture was always dusty; it was that the papered walls were saturated with dirt;—it was that the floors were never cleaned;—it was that the uninhabited rooms were never sunned, or cleaned, or aired;—it was that the cupboards were always reservoirs of foul air;—it was that the windows were always tight shut up at night;—it was that no window was ever systematically opened, even in the day, or that the right window was not opened. A person gasping for air might open a window for himself. But the servants were not taught to open the windows, to shut the doors; or they opened the windows upon a dank well between high walls, not upon the airier court; or they opened the room doors into the unaired halls and passages, by way of airing the rooms. Now all this is not fancy, but fact.

In that handsome house I have known in one summer three cases of hospital pyæmia, one of phlebitis, two of consumptive cough: all the immediate products of foul air. When, in temperate climates, a house is more unhealthy in summer than in winter, it is a certain sign of something wrong. Yet nobody learns the lesson. Yes, God always justifies His ways. He is teaching while you are not learning. This poor body loses his finger, that one loses his life. And all from the most easily preventible causes.[9]

The houses of the grandmothers and great grandmothers of this generation, at least the country houses, with front door and back door always standing open, winter and summer, and a thorough draught always blowing through—with all the scrubbing, and cleaning, and polishing, and scouring which used to go on, the grandmothers, and still more the great grandmothers, always out of doors and never with a bonnet on except to go to church, these things entirely account for the fact so often seen of a great grandmother, who was a tower of physical vigour descending into a grandmother perhaps a little less vigorous but still sound as a bell and healthy to the core, into a mother languid and confined to her carriage and house, and lastly into a daughter sickly and confined to her bed. For, remember, even with a general decrease of mortality you may often find a race thus degenerating and still oftener a family. You may see poor little feeble washed-out rags, children of a noble stock, suffering morally and physically, throughout their useless, degenerate [Pg 19]lives, and yet people who are going to marry and to bring more such into the world, will consult nothing but their own convenience as to where they are to live, or how they are to live.

With regard to the health of houses where there is a sick person, it often happens that the sick room is made a ventilating shaft for the rest of the house. 

For while the house is kept as close, unaired, and dirty as usual, the window of the sick room is kept a little open always, and the door occasionally. Now, there are certain sacrifices which a house with one sick person in it does make to that sick person: it ties up its knocker; it lays straw before it in the street. Why can't it keep itself thoroughly clean and unusually well aired, in deference to the sick person?

We must not forget what, in ordinary language, is called "Infection;"[10]—a thing of which people are generally so afraid that they frequently follow the very practice in regard to it which they ought to avoid. Nothing used to be considered so infectious or contagious as small pox; and people not very long ago used to cover up patients with heavy bed clothes, while they kept up large fires and shut the windows. Small pox, of course, under this régime, is very "infectious." People are somewhat wiser now in their management of this disease. They have ventured to cover the patients lightly and to keep the windows open; and we hear much less of the "infection" of small pox than we used to do. But do people in our days act with more wisdom on the subject of "infection" in fevers—scarlet fever, measles, &c.—than their forefathers did with small pox? Does not the popular idea of "infection" involve that people should take greater care of themselves than of the patient? that, for instance, it is safer not to be too much with the patient, not to attend too much to his wants? Perhaps the best illustration of the utter absurdity of this view of duty in attending on "infectious" diseases is afforded by what was very recently the practice, if it is not so even now, in some of the European lazarets—in which the plague-patient used to be condemned to the horrors of filth, overcrowding, and want of ventilation, while the medical attendant was ordered to examine the patient's tongue through an opera-glass and to toss him a lancet to open his abscesses with!

True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defence a true nurse either asks or needs.

Wise and humane management of the patient is the best safeguard against infection.

Footnote [10]

Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases, as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs? instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our own control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves.

I was brought up, both by scientific men and ignorant women, distinctly to believe that small-pox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as much as that there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs), and that small-pox would not begin itself any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my eyes and smelt with my nose small-pox growing up in first specimens, either in close rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been "caught," but must have begun.

Nay, more, I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and pass into one another. Now, dogs do not pass into cats.

I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut.

Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light?

For diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun substantives.

Florence Nightingale had a belief that the external environment created conditions for people to have infections. Cleanliness and fresh air were imperative for prevention of disease and assisting the healing process. She gives the impression that foul air is the cause of disease and may have been influenced by the concept of miasma, that illnesses were airborne. Yet, in her footnote, under the category of infection, she makes two remarkable statements concerning her observation of smallpox and what appears to be pleomorphism.

Smallpox she asserts appeared in persons who could not have caught the disease externally, because they had been in quarantined conditions within a ward. Interestingly, she could smell the disease, she was so intimate with it. Yet she did not catch it herself. The contagiousness of smallpox therefore becomes doubtful.

Fever she says has morphed into typhoid fever then typhus as the ward has become more crowded. Taking into account what appears to be Nightingale's underlying thesis that environmental conditions are the cause of a disease growing from within the individual rather than being passed on from another who  caught it externally, pleomorphism becomes the reason for disease severity as it progresses from its initial stage to its most deadly stage.

Typhoid is supposedly transmitted to humans through fecal affected food or dirty hands. Typhus is supposedly transmitted by fleas. Evidently, they are identifiable by two different types of bacteria. However, it would be interesting to see how reliable these claims are when placed under scrutiny and tests are requested to see whether either typhoid or typhus is detected with controls or when a patient with, say, typhoid is asked to be tested for typhus and vice versa. 

From what has been demonstrated by the late President John Magufuli of Tanzania (an industrial chemist himself) testing for disease is suspect. He sent samples of papaya, goat, and other tissue to be tested for the fake human coronavirus. The specimens came back from the laboratory as positive. Laboratories will produce whatever the technicians think will keep them in employment.

While Florence Nightingale may have had a fixation for cleanliness, fresh air and systematic attendance of patients in hospitals or wherever they may be bedridden, she also made some observations that medical professionals indoctrinated into the allopathic mindset of germ theory are not too keen to admit occurred. "I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and pass into one another," she wrote.

Those discussing her writings tend to dismiss her idea about foul air as an emotional conclusion as to why disease might exist and limit her contribution to nursing only, by emphasizing her calls cleanliness and systematic observation of patients, not realizing that by conditions, she was implying that all diseases are actually the response of a malnourished body to an unhealthy environment.  

Bacteria, bacteriophages, which are often mistaken for viruses, as are extracellular vesicles, of which include exosomes, microvesicles (MVs), ectosomes, oncosomes, and apoptotic bodies. Now what are being given different names could very well be what have been observed in the past and termed protits, somatids, and microzyma.

At the crux of germ theory is the idea that the germ, whatever it might be, attacks a healthy or susceptible person, creature or plant and begins to destroy it.  This might be the case with amoebas such as Naegleria fowleri which is said to enter the brain through the nasal passage, cross the cribriform plate and begin feeding on cerebral tissue, killing the person. But this is better classified as a parasite. It is not contagious, but opportunistic. The same could be said about fungal spores that are known to cause illness when people are living or sleeping in a room that is damp and moss is growing on the walls and ceiling. Even under these circumstances, a healthy individual may not be affected by the fungus. Much depends upon the nutritional intake of the individual. As with scurvy, an element of malnourishment needs to be present for it to ravage the body. Merely having insufficient vitamins to maintain healthy tissue is malnourishment.